-->
CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG

Friday, December 30, 2005

Canada vs. USA (NHL Edition)

The good folks at VCOE have a post about the differences between how hockey is treated in Canada and the USA; here's another example.

First, check out this article in the National Post:
We began the year with the lights out, and the memory of an us-against-them final (does anyone remember Calgary meeting Tampa Bay for the Stanley Cup in 2004?) replaced by a them-and-them confrontation -- Gary Bettman v. Bob Goodenow. Bettman cancelled the season in mid-February, marking the first time a major North American sport had lost a full season. To our surprise, we learned we could get by without the NHL. And when it returned, we learned we had been getting by without it for at least a decade. The new rules -- two-line passes, shootouts, stricter enforcement of penalties -- have brought back the excitement that had gone missing.
Next, this excerpt from today's Ottawa Citizen:

It's not often a major professional sports operation gets a chance to drag itself into the service bay and overhaul the working parts from bumper to bumper. However, the National Hockey League got that rare opportunity after the 301-day lockout that wiped out the entire 2004-05 season.

Overhauled with a new set of rules, the results were spectacular as the NHL reopened for business. So spectacular, in fact, that play in the new NHL this season was the overwhelming choice of CanWest newspaper sports editors as the Canadian sports story in 2005. Editors from across the country said the up-and-down, exciting style of play this season has led to a rejuvenated NHL, making the league's new rules the top story in the impact category.
Now, read this article from Michael Rosenberg of Fox Sports listing the top 20 sports stories of 2005 and this one from Scoop Jackson of ESPN Page 2 on the most important stories of 2005 - notice where hockey was on their lists? Neither did I.

On USA Today's poll on what their readers felt were the most important sports stories in 2005, the return of NHL hockey has so far garnered a whopping 3% of the votes.

There is a little bit of hockey coverage on USA Today; Christine Brennan mentioned it near the end of her year-in-review piece:

Meanwhile, the NHL, suffering the ignominy of putting itself right out of business last year, came back but not without further disgracing itself. When hockey returned, so did Todd Bertuzzi. Of all the changes the NHL made to try to win its tiny nationwide fan base back, it failed to make the one that would have won the most support in the kitchens and dens of North America: People who take out opponents can't return until their injured victim does.
Ditto on Sports Illustrated (mention of the NHL is on the second page):

Hockey took the ignominious honor of becoming the first pro league to cancel an entire season due to a labor dispute when commissioner Gary Bettman called off the 2004-05 season in February. This time, the owners stayed firm to their demand of a salary cap -- or in corporate lingo, "cost certainty". The league finally returned this fall with a cap and a series of new rules designed to increase scoring and make the game more free-flowing. The early returns have been mostly positive, with scoring and attendance up, but TV ratings on OLN, the league's new hard-to-find U.S. cable partner, predictably microscopic.
However, despite low ratings and little publicity south of the border, why do I get the impression that they also yield the most influence when it comes to dictating changes to the game?
posted by J.J. Guerrero, 7:26 PM

5 Comments:

At December 31, 2005 2:01 AM, Blogger BCSportsFanatic said...

No point trying to debate Hockey with Americans, they're completely ignorant. Betteman simply wanted to cash in on the expansion theme while it was hot.

Scoop Jackson only writes about "Black" topics.

 
At December 31, 2005 12:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Scoop Jackson is the most infamous race-baiter on the internet. I hardly think he qualifies as a representative of mainstreaam American sports journalism.

 
At December 31, 2005 12:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, and Christine Brennan is USA Today's token female sports journalist who bemoans the rest of the sporting world for ignoring female sports.

So again, not a very fair representative for mainstream sports journalism in the States.

Either way, not a big deal. I just know as a Canadian, I wouldn't want Americans using Dan Shultz and Glenn Healy as representatives of Canadian sports journalism.

 
At December 31, 2005 12:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ha. Found this clasic from Christine called "Latest violence calls future of NHL into question".

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/columnist/brennan/2004-03-10-brennan_x.htm

With the best part being:

"Moore suffered deep cuts to his face, lying in a pool of his own blood for several minutes before he was removed on a stretcher. Just another hockey night in Canada, eh? Apparently so."


Maybe hockey is better off having American writters ignore it.

 
At December 31, 2005 2:17 PM, Blogger BCSportsFanatic said...

word...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home